SmartM2M; oneM2M deployment guidelines and good practices

Bob Flynn , Luigi Liquori (1, 2) , Samir Medjiah (3, 4, 5) , Thierry Monteil (6, 7, 8, 5) , Marie-Agnès Peraldi-Frati (2, 9)

1 KAIROS - Logical Time for Formal Embedded System Design
2 UniCA - Université Côte d'Azur
3 UT - Université de Toulouse
4 UT3 - Université Toulouse III - Paul Sabatier
5 LAAS-SARA - Équipe Services et Architectures pour Réseaux Avancés
6 IRIT-SEPIA - Système d’exploitation, systèmes répartis, de l’intergiciel à l’architecture
7 INSA Toulouse - Institut National des Sciences Appliquées - Toulouse
8 IRIT - Institut de recherche en informatique de Toulouse
9 I3S - Laboratoire d'Informatique, Signaux, et Systèmes de Sophia Antipolis

The present document describes how to complement the ETSI view by liaising with oneM2M technical bodies for consultation during the definition of the deployment scenarios. From the stakeholder point of view, it can help on the adoption of oneM2M through indicators such as performance evaluation to assess the performance of their proposed products. IoT platforms customers can define their specific deployment scenarios and evaluate the performance of a given IoT platform against their scenarios. Finally, the Open-Source Communities around oneM2M may benefit from these results by taking the output of the development of the TTF PoC into their roadmaps.

Mots clés: Standardisation IoT; IoT model; oneM2M standard; ETSI TC SmartM2M; IoT Protocols and Standards; Performance evaluation of IoT platforms; IoT methodology oneM2M performance scenarios simulation; Performance; Scenarios; Simulation

Domaines: Informatique [cs]

Bob Flynn, Luigi Liquori, Samir Medjiah, Thierry Monteil, Marie-Agnès Peraldi-Frati. SmartM2M; oneM2M deployment guidelines and good practices. ETSI Technical Report, 2024. ⟨hal-04753246⟩