B. Academy, Peer Review: the challenges for the humanities and social sciences, 2007.

J. Adams and D. Smith, Evaluation of the British Research Assessment Exercise Evaluating the Performance-Based Research Fund, Framing the Debate, 2006.

H. Ahrc, Use of research metrics in the arts and humanities. Report of the Expert Group set up jointly by the Arts and Humanities Research Council and the Higher Education Funding Council for England, 2006.

L. Bakker, Evaluating the Performance-Based Research Fund, 2006.

P. Baty, Cardiff to take part in audit of stress', Times Higher Education Supplement, 41% would like next exercise to be halted', Times Higher Education Supplement, 2005.

D. Brenneis, International Benchmarking Review of UK Social Anthropology: An International Assessment of UK Social Anthropology Research, 2006.

R. Calabrese and B. Roberts, Self???interest and scholarly publication: the dilemma of researchers, reviewers, and editors, International Journal of Educational Management, vol.18, issue.6, pp.335-376, 2004.
DOI : 10.1108/09513540410553988

B. Charlton, What has the RAE ever done for Oxford University'? Improvement in normal science ? but decline in revolutionary science, pp.3-5, 2008.

B. Charlton and P. Andras, Down-shifting' among top UK scientists? - The decline of 'revolutionary science' and the rise of 'normal science' in the UK compared with the USA', Medical Hypotheses, pp.465-72, 2008.

P. Ciancanelli, Re)producing universities: Knowledge dissemination, market power and the global knowledge commons, Geographies of Knowledge, Geographies of Power. World Yearbook of Education: Routledge), 2008.

Z. Corbyn, New RAE based on citations', Times Higher Education SupplementDenham wants policy advice credited in REF', Times Higher EducationResearchers raise questions over validity of REF citations criteria', Times Higher Education, p.11, 2007.

R. Dearing, Higher Education in the Learning Society. Summary Report of the National Committee of Inquiry into Higher Education, Norwich: HMSO.), 1997.

L. Elton, The UK Research Assessment Exercise: Unintended Consequences', Higher Education Quarterly, pp.274-83, 2000.

A. Fazackerley, Treasury focus on top 10', Times Higher Education Supplement, 2006.

N. Frølich, The Politics of Steering by Numbers. Debating Performance-Based Funding in Europe, 2008.

H. Hansen, . Foss, and F. Borum, The Construction and Standardization of Evaluation: The Case of the Danish University Sector, Evaluation, vol.5, issue.3, pp.303-332, 1999.
DOI : 10.1177/13563899922209002

R. Hodgson, The editors and authors of economics journals: a case of international oligopoly?' The Economic Journal, pp.165-86, 1999.

C. House, Research Assessment Exercise: a re-assessment', Eleventh Report of Session, Science and Technology Committee, issue.4, 2003.

G. Kinman, F. Jones, and R. Kinman, The well-being of the UK academy, Quality in Higher Education, pp.15-27, 1998.

T. Kuhn, The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, 1962.

R. Lambert, Lambert Review of Business-University Collaboration, 2003.

. London, Submission to the [House of Commons'] Select Committee on Science and Technology's Inquiry into Strategic Science Provision, 2005.

M. Manna and . La, Superstar " rating is not the issue', Times Higher Education Supplement, p.13, 2004.

I. Mcnay, The impact of the 1992 RAE on institutional and individual behaviour in English higher education: the evidence from a research project, Bristol: HEFCE), 1996.

M. Power, The Audit Society. Rituals of Verification, 1997.

. Roberts, R. Gareth, and . Review, Review of Research Assessment, 2003.

R. Scurr, When filling out RAE entry forms, the first question should be: Have you reproduced in the past seven years?' Times Higher Education Supplement, 2007.

P. Sheehan, A perspective on the proposed Australian Research Quality Framework Evaluating the Performance-Based Research Fund, 2006.

C. Shore and S. Wright, Coercive accountability: the rise of audit culture in higher education, Audit Cultures. Anthropological Studies in Accountability, Ethics and the Academy (EASA Series): Routledge), 2000.

A. Smith, Making Mathematics Count, the Report of Professor Adrian Smith's Inquiry into Post-14 Mathematics Education, 2004.

C. Stothart, Zeros make heroes', Times Higher Education Supplement, p.6, 2006.

T. Tahir, Durham don sent on leave, Times Higher Education Supplement, 2007.

T. Tysome, UK boosts its tally of Nobel laureates', Times Higher Education Supplement, 2006.

A. Usher and M. Savino, A World of Difference: A Global Survey of University League Tables, Canadian Education Report Series Educational Policy Institute, 2006.

I. Velody, Knowledge for what? The intellectual consequences of the Research Assessment Exercise, History of the Human Sciences, vol.12, issue.4, pp.111-157, 1999.
DOI : 10.1177/09526959922120405

G. Whittington, THE 1996 RESEARCH ASSESSMENT EXERCISE, The British Accounting Review, vol.29, issue.2, pp.181-97, 1997.
DOI : 10.1006/bare.1997.0053

S. Wright, Markets, corporations, consumers? New landscapes of higher education', Learnng and Teaching in the Social Sciences, pp.71-93, 2004.

N. Academy and . British, Peer Review: the challenges for the humanities and social sciences, 2007.

J. Adams and D. Smith, Evaluation of the British Research Assessment Exercise Evaluating the Performance-Based Research Fund, Framing the Debate, 2006.

L. Bakker, Evaluating the Performance-Based Research Fund, 2006.

P. Baty, 41% would like next exercise to be halted', Times Higher Education Supplement, 2006.